Illustration: wealth paths spread over time with a shaded uncertainty band; a dashed horizontal line marks one fixed target while outcomes land at different levels.

Blog

Why one “corpus number” is not enough

· General education, not advice

Spreadsheets and calculators love spitting out a single target: “You need ₹X by age Y.” That number can be useful as a starting point—but treating it as truth undersells how messy real paths are.

Markets don’t move in a straight line

Most simple projections assume a steady return year after year. In practice, sequence matters: early bad years near retirement weigh differently than the same average return smoothed over decades. One fixed corpus figure rarely captures that.

Inflation and spending aren’t fixed either

Your future spending in “today’s rupees” is a guess. Long-run inflation is uncertain. A single nominal target often bakes in one scenario for both. Stressing a band (lower / base / higher) is usually more honest than defending one cell in a sheet.

What to do instead

You don’t need a PhD—just a habit:

  • Separate lifestyle spend from corpus math and revisit both periodically.
  • Ask what happens if returns are a few points lower for a decade, not just in one average cell.
  • Prefer “chance of hitting the goal by target age” (or time-to-target under stress) over a single yes/no line.

Our FI planning guide walks through corpus and inflation in more depth; this post is only the framing.